Airplane windows have rounded corners because sharp corners concentrate stress in a pressurised cabin's skin5. The lesson came in 1954, when two de Havilland Comets broke apart in mid-air2, 5.
The first jet airliner
On 2 May 1952 the de Havilland Comet became the world's first jet airliner in passenger service, flying to Johannesburg2, 6. Because it flew far higher than propeller airliners, its cabin was pressurised to about 8.25 psi above outside air, about double that of earlier airliners2, 5. Every flight inflated the fuselage slightly; every landing let it relax2.
Two crashes and a giant water tank
On 10 January 1954, Comet G-ALYP broke up near Elba after leaving Rome, killing all 35 on board5. After modifications, flights resumed on 23 March5. On 8 April, G-ALYY broke up near Naples, killing 21, and the Comet was grounded2, 5.
The Royal Navy recovered about 70% of the Elba wreck2, 9. Sir Arnold Hall, director of the Royal Aircraft Establishment at Farnborough, led the technical investigation14, 15. A complete Comet, G-ALYU, was sunk in a water tank and its cabin pressurised again and again; water hardly compresses, so a rupture would not destroy the evidence2, 5. After about 3,060 cycles, earlier airline flights included, it split near a corner of the forward escape hatch2, 5.
The real culprit
G-ALYP's break began in the cabin roof, around two small windows for a direction-finding antenna5, 6, 7. A fatigue crack had grown from a bolt hole near the rear window over about 1,290 pressurised flights2, 5. Later research found a small manufacturing defect at the countersunk edge of that bolt hole, likely hidden under the bolt head and hard to spot on inspection2, 4, 14. Any hole in a stretched sheet piles up stress at its edge, about three times the average in the textbook case, and more at tight corners2, 5, 13.
De Havilland's test section had survived 16,000 cycles5, but it had first been pressurised to twice the working load, which probably strengthened its corners and hid the danger2, 5. The court blamed fatigue for Elba and called the same cause for Naples 'at least possible'9. A later analysis argues the rivets and bolts around the windows mattered more than their squarish shape2.
Lessons built into every airliner
Later Comets, including the Comet 4, got oval windows and thicker skin around openings; around curved edges, stress flows past with little build-up2, 5, 6. The Comet 4 flew the first transatlantic jet service on 4 October 1958, and Comets carried passengers until 19802, 6. Rival jets such as the Boeing 707 used 'fail-safe' structure with backup load paths and ways to stop cracks5. Today, US rules demand full-scale fatigue test evidence and inspections based on how fast cracks can grow8.
The window you look through today
A typical cabin window has three panes, usually acrylic11, 12. The outer pane carries the cabin pressure, flight after flight11, 12. Behind it sits a thinner pane (often called the middle pane; technical documents say 'inner pane') that is a fail-safe: if the outer pane breaks, it must hold the pressure alone10, 12. In 2022 the FAA ordered some windows on Embraer jets replaced because that backup pane was too thin10.
Its tiny bleed hole lets cabin air into the gap between the panes, so the pressure on both sides of the backup pane evens out and the load rests on the outer pane11, 12; a Boeing engineer says it also lets moisture out, reducing fog and frost11. The pane you can touch is a thin, non-structural scratch pane that protects the others11, 12.
What we're not sure about
G-ALYU's cycle total (3,057 or about 3,060) and the test section's (16,000 or 18,000) differ between sources2, 5.
Sources differ on how much the squarish shape mattered versus the rivets and bolts2, 5, 6.
The Naples crash was never fully explained, because almost no wreckage was recovered5, 9.
The starting flaw's size is uncertain: about 0.1 mm in a 1997 estimate, about 1.5 mm in a later microscope study2, 14.
Sources
- Court of Inquiry into the Comet accidents (Cohen), CAP 127, HMSO 1955
- Withey, P.A. (1997): Fatigue failure of the de Havilland Comet I. Engineering Failure Analysis 4(2):147-154
- Review of the Comet I G-ALYP fuselage failure (Court of Enquiry 1955, Swift, Withey)
- Wanhill, R.J.H.: Milestone case histories in aircraft structural integrity (NLR-TP-2002-521)
- FAA Lessons Learned: de Havilland DH-106 Comet 1
- Aerossurance: Common Comet Misconceptions
- Science Museum Group: Section of upper fuselage of Comet G-ALYP showing fatigue cracks
- 14 CFR 25.571 Damage-tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure
- Hansard, HC Deb 16 February 1955 vol 537 cc388-92: Comet Aircraft Accidents (Report of Inquiry), statement by the Minister (Boyd-Carpenter)
- FAA Airworthiness Directive 2022-08-07 (Embraer ERJ 170/190, NORDAM passenger windows), Federal Register Vol. 87 No. 69, 11 April 2022, p. 21003
- Vanhoenacker, M. (2015): Why Do Airplane Windows Have Tiny Holes? Slate, 29 May 2015 (quotes M. Moncur, GKN Aerospace, and B. Jensen, Boeing)
- Arnot, M. (2019): What Are Airplane Windows Made of? (And What Is That Little Hole?) The Points Guy, 12 Jan 2019 (quotes J. Webb, GKN)
- McGinty, B.: Stress Concentrations at Holes (Kirsch solution). fracturemechanics.org
- Withey, P. (2019): The Real Story of the Comet Disasters. Lecture announcement, RAeS Hamburg Branch / HAW Hamburg, 24 Jan 2019 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.2551089)
- Airbus: Meet Arnold Hall
Researched and independently fact-checked on 23 October 2026. Found a mistake? Tell us at querigami@gmail.com and we will correct it here.
Even careful research can contain errors, and science keeps moving. This article is for general information and education only, not professional advice. We link to sources so you can check them yourself, but we are not responsible for the content of external websites.